Fed Removes Shackle Imposed on Wells Fargo After Series of Scandals
For years, Wells Fargo was cheating it’s depositors, particularly it’s older ones. They did so by adding phony accounts that had fees attached and by raising fees without informing them. How could this happen in a storied institution such as Wells, you might well ask? It did so, because the bonuses of the crooks involved were higher as a result!
The revelations came to light in 2016. Since then, the CEO position has seen multiple changes and the institution has been on a justifiably, short leash.
It has taken until now for regulators to be comfortable enough to take
off the Shackles Imposed on Wells Fargo after a series of scandalous practices came to light.
For seven years, the bank was forced to operate under extreme observation across the board, as punishment for misconduct including creating fraudulent bank accounts and mistakenly seizing homes.
Apparently, nobody taught the Wells’ management of the time, that there would be a price to pay for their deceptions! Hopefully, they have learned, “the hard way!”
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/03/business/wells-fargo-asset-cap-federal-reserve.html?smid=em-share
Find Rob’s book & ebook “What Goes Around Comes Around – A Guide To How Life REALLY Works” at Amazon or Audible
Kirkus Reviews says:
A stable, nonpreachy, objective voice makes the book stand apart from others in the genre. A successful guide that uses anecdotes of real human experiences to reveal powerful truths about life.
Fed loosens the shackles on Wells Fargo nearly a decade after fake accounts scandal
The Federal Reserve is loosening a major restriction on Wells Fargo (WFC) that was put in place following a fake accounts scandal nearly a decade ago, and the fourth-largest US bank will no longer have to operate under a $1.95 trillion asset cap.
The move was a victory for CEO Charles Scharf, who said when he took over the top job in 2019 that his “first priority” was to clean up the messes left by his predecessors.
“The Federal Reserve’s decision to lift the asset cap marks a pivotal milestone in our journey to transform Wells Fargo,” he said in a release.
Wells Fargo’s stock climbed as much as 3% in premarket trading on Wednesday. Its stock has climbed more than 50% during Scharf’s tenure as CEO.
The lifting of the cap will help Scharf go on the offensive as he tries to make Wells Fargo into a major investment banking player, edging deeper into a hyper-competitive business where it lags behind Wall Street giants like Goldman Sachs (GS), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), and Morgan Stanley (MS).
The Fed imposed the broad restriction as part of a wider consent order in 2018, citing “widespread consumer abuses” at Wells Fargo after federal investigations revealed a wide-ranging sales practice scandal in 2016. It couldn’t go past the $1.95 trillion in assets it had at the end of 2017 unless regulators said so.
“The removal of the growth restriction reflects the substantial progress the bank has made in addressing its deficiencies and that the bank has fulfilled the conditions required for removal of the growth restriction,” the Federal Reserve said in a press release.
The other provisions in the 2018 enforcement action still remain in place until the bank satisfies the requirements for their termination.
Scharf has now ticked off 13 consent orders that regulators had in place when he became boss, seven of which have been lifted this year.
“We are a different and far stronger company today because of the work we’ve done,” he added in a release. “We are excited to continue to move forward with plans to further increase returns and growth in a deliberate manner supported by the processes and cultural changes we have made.”
In more recent months, Scharf and the rest of Wells Fargo’s current management team have tried to play down any expectation for an immediate earnings boost once the asset cap is removed.
“I would just caution that when it does happen, it’s not this kind of light switch moment,” CFO Mike Santomassimo said while speaking at a UBS conference as far back as March 2024.
Even with its biggest disciplinary penalty lifted, Wells Fargo still faces other disciplinary actions from regulators.
Along with the remaining 2018 Fed consent order, Wells Fargo has an agreement with the OCC that states the bank violated part of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. It also still has a formal agreement with the OCC from last year, when its regulator identified “deficiencies” in the bank’s anti-money-laundering controls.
Fed governor Michael Barr, who recently departed as the Fed’s top banking cop, made it clear in a statement that regulators will continue to keep a close eye on the bank.
“Removal of the asset cap represents successful remediation to the required standard based on focused management leadership, strong board oversight, and strict supervision holding the firm accountable,” he said.
“All three will need to continue for the firm to have a sustainable approach.”
David Hollerith is a senior reporter for Yahoo Finance covering banking, crypto, and other areas in finance.
Kirkus Reviews, the gold-standard for independent & accurate reviews, has this to say about
What Goes Around Comes Around:
A successful guide that uses anecdotes to reveal powerful truths about life.
The stable, positive, non-preachy and objective voice makes the book stand apart from others in the genre.
~ Kirkus Reviews
“I’ve read a number of books that focus on sharing a similar message, including “The Secret” by Rhonda Byrne, “The Answer” by John Assaraf & Murray Smith, “The Celestine Prophecy” by James Redfield, “Think and Grow Rich,” by Napoleon Hill, and I must say that I find Rob’s to be my favorite.” – Sheryl Woodhouse, founder of Livelihood Matters LLC
Fed Removes Shackle Imposed on Wells Fargo After Series of Scandals
Fed Removes Shackle Imposed on Wells Fargo After Series of Scandals
New research shows small gestures matter even more than we may think.
I wonder about when this train actually went off the rail and Balwani and Holmes both knew it. It reminds me somewhat of Bernie Madoff’s $20 Billion deception in that if Bernie had fessed up when his performance first went south and he tried to cover it up, only to make it worse, he might largely have been forgiven and returned to his original trading business. But he just couldn’t do that and as time went on…well we know the result.
Was there a similar trajectory for this pair? A time when they looked at each other and said, “Uh oh!” Not that it matters really. Somewhere along the way they knew what was going down and kept it going for as long as they could. Now have to face the music as eventually, always is the case. It is simply “The Law of Cause and Effect” unfolding. Hopefully for them there will be less tragic endings than Bernie. It depends on how they handle what they have wrought! We’ll see.

